It is a much-mooted question as to whether or not William the Conqueror deserved to win the Battle of Hastings. It is highly subjective and depends heavily on perspective. Was he a saint or was he a villain? Whatever your point of view – pro-Saxon or pro-Norman – no one can disagree that he took a huge risk and if fortune favours the brave it paid off for the Duke in spades. But, when considering if he deserved the English crown, which he ultimately took by force, there are several things to consider
Duke William benefitted from good planning, possibly, a lot of luck and definitely some great timing. If successful generals make their own luck when weighing up risk against the odds, then on balance we should assume that the Duke deserved the fruits of his victory. In summary, while William’s victory can be attributed to his strategic prowess and preparation, the context of the battle and the lead-up to it also play critical roles in determining whether he “deserved” to win, making it a nuanced topic
